![]() Which is why it's also important to see how people actually evaluate Defender either under a VM or actual host machine because results can differ. Many of the advanced malware and viruses intentionally disable themselves when running in a VM and then reactivate themselves once out of VM, so the people can't easily study the behaviour of the malware and viruses while running in a VM nor effectively scan for them when running a server program in a VM either. Its just my personal opinion but living without any security is not worth the risk, While Defender failed in much of the ransomware tests, that's still better then no antivirus appĪnother appeal less well known running VMs is that advanced malware and viruses won't infect VM systems precisely because they know running in a VM means that they are not infecting the host machine. Also a similar problem on the macOS side - macOS has its share of malware and their use of various developer certificates, so again you think you're doing the right things and boom you're infected or worse your data is encrypted. I forget the app, but if memory serves me there was one situation where that if you downloaded a known app from the developer's site it was infected. I'd rather not rely solely on common sense when in a flash your data could be gone. Just look at how many of these products prohibit your data from being encrypted. We don't live in a vacuum, and as such its my belief that safe computing practices can only take you so far, and you still need some level of protection. Whether its due to someone else getting infected and you're on the same network, i.e., propagating through the network, or just receiving an email with an attachment - even if you're expecting that attachment, it certainly could be infected. Click to expand.The first line of defense is certainly your brain but I think even with common sense, there is a risk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |